The reference page
What the Brutally Honest audit checks
An automated audit of 84 checks, scored out of 100, graded A+ to F-. It's built to be harsh and forbidden from flattering you. Every criticism quotes the actual thing it found on your page. This page documents the nine areas, the severities, the hard caps, and the restrictions that make the reports safe to act on.
The nine areas
The split is itself an argument about what actually matters.
| # | What it examines | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is there anything worth reading? | 20 |
| 2 | Can search engines and AI reach the page at all? | 15 |
| 3 | The headline and description shown in search results | 15 |
| 4 | Could an AI quote this page as a source? | 15 |
| 5 | Is the page structured like a proper document? | 10 |
| 6 | Speed, and whether it works properly on a phone | 8 |
| 7 | Machine-readable labels describing what's on the page | 7 |
| 8 | How the page looks when shared or texted to someone | 5 |
| 9 | Images, links, and usability for people with disabilities | 5 |
1. Is there anything worth reading? (20 points — the heaviest section)
The non-commodity test. Does this page contain anything an AI couldn't have written by itself without ever knowing your business? Real prices. Actual service areas or delivery times. Photos you took. Your guarantee. Opening hours. A customer's own words. If the answer is no — if the page is well-written but generic, the sort of thing any competitor could publish word for word — it fails, and the grade is capped no matter how good everything else is.
2. Can search engines and AI reach the page at all? (15 points)
Two kinds of AI crawler, and people block the wrong one. Training crawlers gather text to train future models — blocking those is a legitimate business decision. Search crawlers fetch your page right now to answer someone's question right now — blocking those removes you from those answers entirely. They're easy to confuse and often blocked together by accident. The audit reports which is which.
3. The headline and description shown in search results (15 points)
The title tag and meta description. The description doesn't affect ranking at all — it affects whether anyone clicks. A page can rank well and still never get visited because the description is blank, duplicated, or says nothing specific. The audit checks both, and flags a title that still says "Home".
4. Could an AI quote this page as a source? (15 points)
AI-quotability. Hiding invisible text aimed at manipulating AI systems is an automatic, unappealable F-. The audit checks whether the page's content is structured so a machine can quote it cleanly: specific numbers rather than vague claims, facts in real tables, and sections that still make sense when quoted on their own.
5. Is the page structured like a proper document? (10 points)
Heading structure. A designer wants the footer links slightly bigger, so they mark them up as headings. To a person it looks fine. To a machine reading the structure, your page about your main service appears to have thirty-nine sections, most of them named after footer links that have nothing to do with the topic. The audit reads the outline the way a machine does.
6. Speed, and whether it works properly on a phone (8 points)
The audit reports speed and must label clearly whether it's quoting real Chrome user data or a lab simulation, because the two often disagree dramatically. A lab run on a fast connection can look excellent while real users on mid-range phones on cellular data see something far slower. The audit refuses to conflate the two.
7. Machine-readable labels describing what's on the page (7 points)
Schema markup. Scored low on purpose because the research shows adding these labels doesn't by itself get you cited more by AI. The audit also warns that marked-up reviews that don't appear on screen can trigger a Google penalty — markup must match what's visible.
8. How the page looks when shared or texted to someone (5 points)
The share preview. When someone pastes your URL into a message or a post, the title, description and image that appear are what they actually see of your business. The audit checks that these are specific and correct, not blank or generic.
9. Images, links, and usability for people with disabilities (5 points)
Images, links, and accessibility. Alt text on meaningful images, descriptive link text (never "click here"), visible focus rings, and sufficient contrast. These are worth fewer points because a page can pass them all and still be a blank brochure to an AI — but failing them is a sign of carelessness the audit will name.
Grading: severities and hard caps
Each of the 84 checks carries a severity worth four, three, two or one point: critical (4), high (3), medium (2), low (1). Checks the auditor could not measure are set aside rather than counted as failures.
Then come the hard caps, and these matter more than the arithmetic. Think of a driving test: certain mistakes are an automatic fail no matter how well you did on everything else.
Confidence level is reported separately from the grade. A grade with too much unmeasured is called provisional rather than pretending to certainty.
| If the page… | The grade cannot exceed |
|---|---|
| Is blocked, broken, or shows different content to search engines than to people | F- |
| Contains hidden text aimed at manipulating AI | F- |
| Is more than half invisible without JavaScript | D |
| Has no headline or no main title | D+ |
| Is the wrong type of page for what people are searching | C- |
| Contains nothing a competitor couldn't have written | C |
| Has any unresolved critical issue | B- |
| Has any unresolved high-severity issue | A- |
What it refuses to do
This is the part that makes the reports safe to act on.
It cannot make things up.
Anything it couldn't measure is marked "NOT VERIFIED" rather than estimated. Every criticism must quote the actual thing it found on your page — the real headline, the real text. No evidence, no claim.
It cannot promise you traffic.
Every recommendation gets a range and a confidence level, never a guarantee.
It cannot fudge the numbers.
Each report ends with an honest verdict on whether the recommended work can realistically grow that page's traffic by 50%. It's forbidden from massaging the arithmetic to reach that figure, and required to say plainly when on-page work alone won't get there and what else would be needed.
It won't sell you popular nonsense.
It maintains a list of fashionable tactics it will not recommend, including special "AI instruction files" that Google openly ignores, creating a separate page for every search phrase, buying reviews or mentions, and two types of search markup that Google retired but which agencies still sell.
It won't touch your customers or your data.
When it tests a checkout, booking, quote or enquiry flow it stops before anything is submitted: it never places an order, sends a form or types in customer details. It's forbidden from sending anyone's email address, name or other personal details to any outside service.
Get this for your page — free
Grade My Page →